Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Write For Us
    • Newsletter
    • Contact
    Instagram
    About ChromebooksAbout Chromebooks
    • News
      • Stats
    • AI
    • How to
      • DevOps
      • IP Address
    • Apps
    • Business
    • Q&A
      • Opinion
    • Gaming
      • Google Games
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Contact
    About ChromebooksAbout Chromebooks
    AI

    BLIP-2 Statistics 2026

    Dominic ReignsBy Dominic ReignsJanuary 23, 2026Updated:January 23, 2026No Comments8 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

    BLIP-2 reached 536,142 monthly downloads on Hugging Face as of 2024, establishing itself as a foundational vision-language model since its January 2023 release by Salesforce Research. The model achieved 65.0% accuracy on zero-shot VQAv2 benchmarks while training only 188 million parameters, representing 54 times fewer trainable parameters than competing models. This analysis examines verified performance metrics, adoption statistics, and technical specifications that demonstrate BLIP-2’s continued relevance in multimodal AI development.

    BLIP-2 Key Statistics

    • BLIP-2 records 536,142 monthly downloads on Hugging Face with the blip2-opt-2.7b variant as the most popular model checkpoint.
    • The model accumulated 3,099 academic citations by September 2024, ranking among the top 10 most cited AI papers published in 2023.
    • BLIP-2 achieved 8.7% higher accuracy than Flamingo80B on zero-shot VQAv2 tasks despite using 54 times fewer trainable parameters.
    • The Q-Former architecture requires only 188 million trainable parameters while connecting to language models containing up to 11 billion parameters.
    • Memory requirements drop to 1.8 GB with Int4 quantization, enabling deployment on consumer-grade hardware for inference tasks.

    BLIP-2 Model Architecture and Parameter Efficiency

    The BLIP-2 framework introduced a parameter-efficient approach through its Querying Transformer architecture. The Q-Former component contains 188 million trainable parameters across 12 transformer layers, generating query embeddings with dimensions of 32 × 768.

    This lightweight module connects frozen image encoders to large language models without requiring end-to-end training. The architecture supports OPT models ranging from 2.7 billion to 6.7 billion parameters and FlanT5 variants from XL to XXL sizes.

    Component Specification
    Q-Former Trainable Parameters 188 million
    Q-Former Transformer Layers 12 layers
    Query Embeddings Output Size 32 × 768
    Image Encoder EVA-CLIP ViT-g/14
    Total Model Size (OPT-2.7B) ~4 billion parameters

    The two-stage pre-training strategy first bootstraps vision-language representation learning using the Q-Former and frozen image encoder. The second stage connects the Q-Former to frozen language models for generative capabilities, transforming an 11-billion parameter LLM into a multimodal system while training less than 2% of total parameters.

    BLIP-2 Benchmark Performance Across Tasks

    BLIP-2 established state-of-the-art results across multiple vision-language benchmarks upon release. The model scored 65.0% on zero-shot VQAv2, surpassing Flamingo80B’s 56.3% performance by 8.7 percentage points.

    On the GQA benchmark, BLIP-2 achieved 52.3% accuracy in zero-shot evaluation. The model recorded a CIDEr score of 121.6 on NoCaps zero-shot captioning tasks, improving 8.4 points over the previous state-of-the-art score of 113.2.

    Fine-tuned BLIP-2 variants reached 145.8 CIDEr on COCO Caption benchmarks, marking a 9.1-point improvement over the original BLIP model’s 136.7 score. Image-to-text retrieval on Flickr30K achieved 92.9% R@1 accuracy, setting new performance standards for the task.

    Zero-Shot Capabilities

    The zero-shot performance improvements demonstrate BLIP-2’s generalization capabilities. The 8.7% VQAv2 accuracy gain over Flamingo80B occurred despite BLIP-2 using 54 times fewer trainable parameters, establishing a new efficiency-performance benchmark for vision-language models.

    BLIP-2 Adoption and Community Impact

    Hugging Face statistics reveal sustained adoption of BLIP-2 in production workflows. The blip2-opt-2.7b checkpoint maintains consistent monthly downloads exceeding 536,000 as of 2024, with 425 likes on the platform.

    The Salesforce organization accumulated 1,990 followers on Hugging Face. Five official BLIP-2 model variants support different language model backends and use cases. The community developed 38 adapter models and 13 fine-tuned derivatives based on BLIP-2’s architecture.

    Over 100 Hugging Face Spaces applications integrate BLIP-2 for image captioning, visual question answering, and multimodal search functionality. This deployment scale demonstrates BLIP-2’s production viability across diverse application domains.

    Academic Recognition

    BLIP-2 accumulated 3,099 citations by September 2024 according to research tracking platforms. This citation rate positioned the paper among the top 10 most cited AI research papers published in 2023.

    The paper appeared at ICML 2023 following its January 30, 2023 release. Hugging Face integration followed within 10 days on February 9, 2023, accelerating community access and experimentation.

    BLIP-2 Computational Requirements and Memory Efficiency

    BLIP-2 supports multiple precision modes that enable deployment across different hardware configurations. Float32 precision requires 14.43 GB for inference and 57.72 GB for training with Adam optimizer.

    Float16 and BFloat16 precision reduce memory requirements to 7.21 GB for inference and 28.86 GB for training. Int8 quantization further decreases inference memory to 3.61 GB with 14.43 GB needed for training operations.

    Precision Mode Inference Memory Training Memory (Adam)
    Float32 14.43 GB 57.72 GB
    Float16/BFloat16 7.21 GB 28.86 GB
    Int8 3.61 GB 14.43 GB
    Int4 1.8 GB 7.21 GB

    Int4 quantization achieves the lowest memory footprint at 1.8 GB for inference and 7.21 GB for training. This configuration enables BLIP-2 deployment on consumer GPUs and edge devices without specialized hardware requirements.

    Inference speed reaches approximately 1 second per image on single GPU setups. This processing rate compares favorably with larger multimodal models that require 40 seconds or more for equivalent tasks.

    BLIP-2 Training Data and Pre-training Methodology

    BLIP-2 pre-training utilized 129 million image-text pairs aggregated from multiple datasets. The training corpus included 115 million pairs from LAION processed with Caption Filtering techniques, plus additional data from COCO, Visual Genome, and Conceptual Captions datasets.

    The pre-training methodology employs three complementary objectives. Image-Text Contrastive learning aligns image and text representations in a shared embedding space. Image-Text Matching captures fine-grained correspondence between visual and linguistic elements.

    Image-grounded Text Generation enables text production conditioned on visual inputs. These three objectives work synergistically across two distinct pre-training stages, with the recommended configuration requiring 16 A100 GPUs for optimal training efficiency.

    Multi-Objective Learning Strategy

    The ITC objective trains the model to associate semantically related image-text pairs while separating unrelated pairs. ITM learning enables the model to determine whether specific text descriptions accurately match given images.

    ITG training develops generative capabilities by conditioning language model outputs on visual features extracted through the Q-Former. This multi-objective approach contributes to BLIP-2’s strong zero-shot transfer performance across diverse downstream tasks.

    BLIP-2 Performance vs Competing Vision-Language Models

    Comparative analysis reveals BLIP-2’s positioning within the vision-language ecosystem. The model achieved 65.0% zero-shot accuracy on VQAv2, while LLaVA-1.5-13B reached 80.0% through end-to-end fine-tuning approaches.

    Flamingo-80B recorded 56.3% zero-shot VQAv2 accuracy with 113.2 CIDEr on NoCaps captioning tasks. InstructBLIP, a BLIP-2 derivative incorporating instruction-tuning, improved performance over the base BLIP-2 model across multiple benchmarks.

    Model VQAv2 Accuracy Architecture Type
    BLIP-2 (FlanT5-XXL) 65.0% (zero-shot) Q-Former adapter
    LLaVA-1.5-13B 80.0% MLP projection
    Flamingo-80B 56.3% (zero-shot) Cross-attention
    InstructBLIP Improved over BLIP-2 Instruction-tuned Q-Former

    BLIP-2 maintains advantages in zero-shot captioning and image-text retrieval tasks compared to models requiring extensive fine-tuning. The Q-Former architecture influenced subsequent developments including InstructBLIP and multiple vision-language models adopting adapter-based approaches.

    BLIP-2 Derivative Models and Applications

    The BLIP-2 architecture spawned multiple specialized derivatives extending its capabilities. InstructBLIP emerged as the most significant extension, incorporating instruction-tuning across 26 datasets covering 11 task categories.

    BLIP-Diffusion adapted the architecture for subject-driven image generation, training on 292,000 OpenImage-V6 subjects. Video-LLaMA extended BLIP-2 to video understanding tasks through audio-visual instruction tuning mechanisms.

    Domain-specific adaptations include BLIP-2 Japanese for Japanese language captioning trained on STAIR captions, and PointBLIP enabling zero-shot 3D point cloud classification. These derivatives demonstrate the architecture’s flexibility across modalities and languages.

    InstructBLIP Advancements

    InstructBLIP achieved state-of-the-art zero-shot performance across 13 held-out datasets by incorporating instruction-aware query embeddings. The model maintains BLIP-2’s parameter efficiency while significantly improving task-specific performance through instruction tuning.

    FAQs

    How many parameters does BLIP-2 require for training?

    BLIP-2 trains only 188 million parameters in its Q-Former component while the image encoder and language model remain frozen. This represents less than 2% of total model parameters when using an 11-billion parameter language model, achieving 54 times fewer trainable parameters than Flamingo80B.

    What benchmark scores did BLIP-2 achieve?

    BLIP-2 scored 65.0% on zero-shot VQAv2, 52.3% on zero-shot GQA, and 121.6 CIDEr on NoCaps zero-shot captioning. Fine-tuned variants reached 145.8 CIDEr on COCO Captions and 92.9% R@1 on Flickr30K image-to-text retrieval tasks.

    How much memory does BLIP-2 require for inference?

    BLIP-2 requires 14.43 GB in Float32 precision, 7.21 GB in Float16, 3.61 GB in Int8, and only 1.8 GB with Int4 quantization. The Int4 configuration enables deployment on consumer-grade GPUs and edge devices without specialized hardware.

    How many downloads does BLIP-2 have on Hugging Face?

    The blip2-opt-2.7b checkpoint records 536,142 monthly downloads on Hugging Face as of 2024. The model has 425 likes and spawned 51 derivative models including 38 adapters and 13 fine-tuned versions across the platform.

    What makes BLIP-2 more efficient than competing models?

    BLIP-2 achieves efficiency through its Q-Former architecture that connects frozen pre-trained components. This approach trains only 188 million parameters compared to billions in end-to-end models, while maintaining competitive performance through strategic vision-language alignment in the Q-Former module.

    Sources

    1. BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models
    2. Salesforce LAVIS Library – Official BLIP-2 Implementation
    3. Hugging Face BLIP-2 Model Repository
    4. Zeta Alpha – Most Cited AI Papers 2023
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
    Dominic Reigns
    • Website
    • Instagram

    As a senior analyst, I benchmark and review gadgets and PC components, including desktop processors, GPUs, monitors, and storage solutions on Aboutchromebooks.com. Outside of work, I enjoy skating and putting my culinary training to use by cooking for friends.

    Related Posts

    VALL-E Statistics 2026

    January 28, 2026

    StarCoder Statistics And User Trends 2026

    January 27, 2026

    AI mode Usage Statistics 2026

    January 22, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Best of AI

    VALL-E Statistics 2026

    January 28, 2026

    StarCoder Statistics And User Trends 2026

    January 27, 2026

    BLIP-2 Statistics 2026

    January 23, 2026

    AI mode Usage Statistics 2026

    January 22, 2026

    Code Llama Statistics 2026

    January 22, 2026
    Trending Stats

    Most searched keywords on Google

    January 27, 2026

    Ahrefs Search Engine Statistics 2026

    January 19, 2026

    Pay Per Click Advertising Statistics 2026

    January 16, 2026

    Google Ads Revenue 2025

    November 29, 2025

    Statistical Analysis Programs for Chromebook 2025

    November 22, 2025
    • About
    • Write For Us
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
    © 2026 About Chrome Books. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.