Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Write For Us
    • Newsletter
    • Contact
    Instagram
    About ChromebooksAbout Chromebooks
    • News
      • Stats
    • AI
    • How to
      • DevOps
      • IP Address
    • Apps
    • Business
    • Q&A
      • Opinion
    • Gaming
      • Google Games
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Contact
    About ChromebooksAbout Chromebooks
    Home - News - Chromebook battery saver: Display refresh rate based on power
    News

    Chromebook battery saver: Display refresh rate based on power

    Kevin TofelBy Kevin TofelJuly 12, 2022Updated:May 9, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

    In March, I noticed that Chrome OS 101 added an experimental flag to support variable refresh rates on Chromebook displays. Today I found a continuation of that effort and it may boost your Chromebook battery life. Google is trying to add functionality that adjusts your Chromebook screen’s refresh rate based on power.

    Variable display refresh rates

    If you’re not familiar with what a variable refresh rate is, this summary from my March report provides a high-level overview:

    If your Chromebook has a 30 Hz display, that basically means it can render or show 30 different frames every second. Likewise, a 60 Hz display can show 60 frames per second. The higher the number, the smoother the overall display looks, particularly when watching videos or playing games.

    Graphics chips and cards can often output video content faster than a basic display can handle them. This is evident by what’s called “screen tearing”; the display can’t keep up with the video output.

    Screen tearing without variable refresh rate

    However, higher-end computers and monitors are available to show video frames as fast as a GPU can send them.

    I have an external monitor, for example, that can display up to 144 frames per second. It’s paired with an Nvidia RTX 3080 GPU that, in many cases, can actually send that many video frames every second. The end result is that I see a much smoother picture on that monitor.

    variable refresh rate test
    Shadow of the Tomb Raider tests well above 100 frames per second.

    The Chromebook battery problem with variable refresh rates

    Assuming your Chromebook does support variable refresh rates, this is a good thing, right?

    Yes, from a visual standpoint. No, from a Chromebook battery standpoint.

    It takes more power to display video at a higher frame rate, which in turn will eat into your Chromebook battery life. So Chrome OS code changes are in the works to address this. The main one explains that a Chromebook will adjust (read: reduce) the display refresh rate when on low power, such as when running on a battery:

    RefreshRateThrottleController observers changes to the power state and requests DisplayConfigurator to throttle the internal display’s refresh rate when in low power scenarios.

    By reducing the display refresh rate of a Chromebook, less power is consumed. In turn, you’d see Chromebook battery savings and longer run-time on a charge.

    Of course, being an experimental, work-in-progress feature, there will be a flag to enable and test this refresh rate throttling. As of now, it will appear at chrome://flags#enable-seamless-refresh-rate-switch.

    Chromebook variable refresh rate throttling flag

    Even though I’m running the latest Chrome OS 105 Dev Channel on my Chromebook, this flag doesn’t yet appear. So it may not show up on early Chromebook builds for a few weeks yet.

    If I can get my hands on a device that does support variable refresh rates, I’ll enable the flag once it lands. Then I can get an idea of how much Chromebook battery life this future feature might save.

    battery life Chrome OS Chromebooks ChromeOS Displays Google variable refresh rates
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
    Kevin Tofel
    • Website

    After spending 15 years in IT at Fortune 100 companies, Kevin turned a hobby into a career and began covering mobile technology in 2003. He writes daily on the industry and has co-hosted the weekly MobileTechRoundup podcast since 2006. His writing has appeared in print (The New York Times, PC Magazine and PC World) and he has been featured on NBC News in Philadelphia.

    Related Posts

    AI Tools With Shortest User Loyalty In 2025

    August 25, 2025

    Is Janitor AI Down?

    August 21, 2025

    Why Meta Quest 4 Could Be the Next Big Thing in VR?

    August 11, 2025

    Comments are closed.

    Best of AI

    Most Repetitive AI Prompts Ever Entered Into Chatbots (2025)

    August 20, 2025

    Which AI Chatbots Are Most Trusted to Handle Sensitive Data? (2025)

    August 15, 2025

    Most Common AI Tools Used at Work (And What They’re Replacing) 2025

    August 11, 2025

    Which AI Chatbot is Used Most by Students?

    August 7, 2025

    Perplexity Statistics And User Trends [2025 Updated]

    July 29, 2025
    Trending Stats

    How Many Chrome Extensions Does the Average User Have – But Never Use? (2025)

    August 27, 2025

    Chrome Mobile Market Share Statistics (2025 Updated)

    August 23, 2025

    Most-Cleared Browser Data Statistics [2025]

    August 22, 2025

    The Most Blocked Sites on Work Devices Using Chrome (2025)

    August 18, 2025

    How Much Time Are You Losing to Chrome Tabs Left Open? (2025 Edition)

    August 16, 2025
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Write For Us
    • Newsletter
    • Contact
    © 2025 About Chrome Books. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.