By now most people know you can run Linux on Chromebooks. Google provides a default Debian build and tools that make it easy to install Linux apps. In the works is a project called Bruschetta, which will use the same architecture of a container and virtual machine to install other operating systems. I noticed the Chrome OS 103 Linux Terminal is prepped for Guest OS installs on a Chromebook.
While it may change, I see how it will be easy to manage and switch between Linux systems on Chromebooks.
Bruschetta will let you install other operating systems on a Chromebook
If you’re not familiar with Bruschetta, 9to5 Google reported some Chrome OS changes related to the project. Based on the name, you can guess that it’s similar to Crostini, which is the Linux on Chromebooks implementation.
Instead of getting the default Debian build of Linux, you’ll be able to use Bruschetta to install any guest OS on Chromebooks. Certainly different Linux distributions will be an option, but perhaps there could be others? ?
The new Chrome OS 103 Linux Terminal on Chromebooks
In any case, here’s what I see when I open up the Linux Terminal using the Chrome OS 103 Dev Channel:
In preparation for Bruschetta, I have added a second container as you can see. However, Google is just now beginning to implement the backend support to install a Guest OS on Chromebooks. So this is really a non-functional addition to the terminal for now.
Other nice improvements are the SSH connections as well as a shortcut to the Developer Settings in Chrome OS.
If you want to quickly connect over SSH to a container’s operating system, you can now do that with a click. And the Developer Settings will include a new sub-section for other operating systems installed via Bruschetta. Google is also just now starting on a user interface for the Guest OS installation, but again, the backend functionality isn’t there yet.
Linux on Chromebooks and… Windows?
With the new Linux Terminal and support for other operating systems, Chromebook users will be able to use whichever version of Linux they want. Yes, Debian is probably great for the masses. But if you’re partial to Arch Linux, right now you have to follow these instructions that are more convoluted than a well-designed installation process.
More importantly, Bruschetta is essentially Google’s virtual machine in a container that could support any operating system, in theory. Perhaps even Microsoft Windows.
Now if that gets you excited, let me just temper your expectations. Bruschetta mainly targets Linux on Chromebooks. However, it’s possible that non-Linux platforms could be supported, either officially or unofficially.
Some readers have told me they want Parallels Desktop for Chromebooks to run Windows on their Chrome OS laptops. That’s still an enterprise product, though. So it’s beyond the reach of most individuals from a licensing or purchasing standpoint. Perhaps Bruschetta will solve that problem, but again, I don’t know just yet.
Here’s an early video look of the new Chrome OS 103 Linux Terminal from Brandon Stecklein:
7 thoughts on “Chrome OS 103 Linux Terminal is prepped for Guest OS installs, aka Bruschetta”
How about running Newareware / Cloudready / Flex in it to still get Chrome OS updates ? lol.
“Some readers have told me they want Parallels Desktop for Chromebooks to run Windows on their Chrome OS laptops. That’s still an enterprise product, though.”
So installing Windows on Crostini Linux using KVM ( various guides i.e. https://beebom.com/install-windows-10-chromebook/ ) doesn’t meet this need?
Not well unless you have a fairly powerful Chromebook and there’s only a handful of devices that officially support KVM.
You also have added legality issues of running Windows 10 as a VM. Additional licensing is required
If I wanted Windows on Chromebook I would only use it if officially supported in some way either by Google or Microsoft as Parallels is.
All these hacky solutions are good / great, but so is having the actual companies supporting the thing. The hacky solutions are easily taken away legally / technically or when the hacker loses interest. Having the company take your money for support shows some interest in long term support.
I understand your concerns, but KVM is no more a “hacky solution” than is VMWare Workstation or Oracle VirtualBox. Granted it isn’t recommended for people without some degree of technical acumen, but it is very widely used, fully legal (so long as you purchase a license for the Windows copy from Microsoft or a reseller and again the same is required for VMWare or VirtualBox) and isn’t going away. KVM can be considered the “free and open source” version of VMWare and VirtualBox. Even there VMWare provides a “licensed but free” version (VMWare Workstation Player) and VirtualBox, though an Oracle product, is open source.
Indeed, people actually do install VirtualBox on Crostini and use it to run Windows virtual machines but KVM is more straightforward.
It’s kind of annoying that you can’t open a terminal window with a single click any more, you have to go through this extra screen. And annoying that you can’t close the terminal with just Ctrl+D, you have to close the extra page separately.